Another Fabrication in Tahdhir al-Nas

The Deobandis have done it again! The book “ Tahdhir al-Nas” which was written by their own scholar Shaykh Qasim Nanotvee, has been tempered again by Deobandis.

It is the same book upon which Fatwa of Kufr was issued by two hundred and sixty leading scholars of India and thirty three leading scholars from Makkah al muazzama and Medina al munawara..

Original Translation

"Prophets are higher /chosen one among their followers( Ummati) only in knowledge. When it comes to good deeds, the ummati( followers) attain the equal status of prophets and some times they go above them "










In the fabricated version it reads

“
"Prophets are higher /chosen one among their followers( Ummati). When it comes to good deeds, the ummati( followers) attain the equal status of prophets and some times they go above them "

Deobandis have deleted “ Only in Knowledge”!

Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni Rh

'O believers! If any disobedient comes to you with any news make a strict inquiry lest you may hurt any people improperly then remain repenting on what you have done. ( 49: 6)

http://www.ahadees.com/english-surah-49.html

It has been an old trick of enemies of Islam to spread rumor and cause confusion among the muslims. Shia and Deobandi , both these deviant sect present false history to the muslim population. Shaykh Rashid Gangohi, who is called ‘Imam e Rabbani” by the Deobandis, said

“ Guru Nanak was the “Khalifah ”[student] of Fariduddeen ganj shakar[ rh] . Since he used to be in the state of ecstasy, muslims did not pay attention to him “
[ Tazkiratur Rashid ]

Imam e Rabbani of the deobandis also said
‘ Guru Nanak was a muslim .‘

Scan :

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/1.jpg

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/2.jpg

This is such a big lie that any lay person can check and see the truth. Baba Fariduddeen Ganj Sahakr [ Radi Allahu taa’la] was born in 1175 CE and died in 1263 CE. Guru Nank , the founder of Sikh religion was born in 1469 CE and died in 1539 CE. There can not be any meeting between these two person ! But the deobandis are so full with love for their “imam e rabbani’ that , they accept this lie to be a fact and still publish that lie in their book !

This is the state of Shaykh Rashid Gangohi , who is one of the top leader of Deobandi sect! This statement not only shows how poor was Shaykh Rashid Ahmed in history , but also , how he used to quote things without any reference! This characteristic of making statements without providing any evidence is a special mark of this deobandi sect!


In past this deobandi made many claims which was refuted and can be read on marifah forums ,under Ahlus sunnah wal jamah section. [ Subcontinent polemics , can be read only by registered members of marifah forums]

This deobandi made more than fifteen post attacking great scholar of Islam , Fazle Rasul Badayuni [rh] and in none of his post he provided any detail about this scholar. This is sufficient to know that this deobandi is not aware of history , like Mawlana Rashid gangohi !

Before I start refuting this deobandi ,I would like to inform that Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni al Uthmani [Rh] was one of the great scholar of Islam who was born in India , in the year 1213 AH and died In 1289 AH. The deobandi who wasted his time in attacking this scholar , could not provide this small detail in any of his post ! Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [rh] was from the well known Uthmani family of Badayun [ India ] and one of the greatest scholar of his time. His knowledge, piety and fame can be realized by the fact that Imam Ahmed Raza Khan Barelwi [rh] went to him to become his disciple ( mureed). Mawlana Fazle rasul Badayuni [rh] , instead sent Imam Ahmed Raza Khan [Rh] to Syed Aale Rasul [Rh] ( in the town of Marhara ) who was another great scholar of that time. Imam Ahmed Raza Khan wrote three hundred and thirteen (313) couplets in praise of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni {rh}


A deobandi said

“Mawlana Hakim Syed Lukhnawi [r.h / father of Shaykh Abul Hassan Ali Nadawi [r.h]] writes in Nuzhat al-Khawatir about Fazl Rasul Badayuni:

"He was a faqih who was argumentative and very biased in his beliefs, in constant opposition of the ulama, most far away from the sunnah and an aid to biddah, encountered the people of haqq with his lies and innovations and a lover of the World.



Our deobandi friend should know that that Hakim Abdul Hay lucknawi was born in 1286 AH and died in 1341 AH. It means he was only three years old when Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni died . So what is the source of this information which he is quoting? From whom did he “hear’ this? In which book did he read this? It seems deobandis are not aware of the basic rule of history. If some one makes a remark about an historical incidence or a person , then it should be supported with a strong evidence, other wise it does not hold any weight. Even if a contemporary scholar makes a remark about another person , he should provide evidence to support his remark and when some one who is not even a contemporary scholar makes a comment , he needs to bring strong evidence to support his claim.

Hakim Abdul Hayy was a wahabi scholar from India, who was against four school of fiqh and sufi tariqah. He supported Hindu view in the dispute of Babari masjid. In his historical biographical work’ Nuzhat al khawatir wa bahjat al masami wal nawazir “, he has made very wrong and biased comments in Vol 6 and 7 about scholars of Ahlus sunnah . But these comments hold no weight , as he has not provided any reference to support his claim.


Deobandi said

“He was a faqih who was argumentative and very biased in his beliefs, in constant opposition of the ulama, most far away from the sunnah and an aid to biddah, encountered the people of haqq with his lies and innovations and a lover of the World.”


It seems Shaykh Abdul Hayy lucknawi did not know which was the first book written on the life of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [ Rh]. And our deobandi friend would not even have thought of this question , before writing his article!

The first book which was written on the life history of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [Rh] was “ Tawaliul anwaar fi mahamad akmalul kamileen al abraar’. It was written by Mawlana Anwar al Haq uthmani ( student of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni) and was first published in 1297 AH , just seven years after the death of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [ Rh]

Scan

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/3.jpg

To realize why Shaykh Abdul Hayy made those remarks , it is sufficient to see the books which Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [ Rh] wrote.

Here is the list from “Tawaliul Anwaar’


http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/14.jpg


http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/15.jpg

1. Tahqeeq rafadayn—This was written when wahabis attacked Hanafis stating rafadyan is a “must” and hanafis have no evidence for not doing rafadayn.

2 A booklet on Mawlid.
4. Sharah Fususl hikam

5 A booklet on Tasawwuf : Written in Makkah al muazzamah on the request of Shaykh Abdul Aziz makki .

6. A booklet on “wahdatul wajood”
7 Al mutaqad al muntaqad.
9. A booklet describing life history of scholars of qadri tariqah.

13 Book dealing with permissibility of saying “ Ya Rasul Allah” .
14 Refuting Ishaq dehalvi ( on his attack on mawlid and tasawwuf)
15 Al bawariqul muhammediya : Refuting wahabis
16 Evidence of ‘shafaat” ( intercession)
18 Refuting wahabi scholar haider ali tonki
19 Virtues of “ tabarruk” ( holy relics)
20 . Sayf al jabbar—perhaps one of the best refutation of wahabi sect

21 On mawlid.

If any wahabi looks at this list , he will definitely call the author as ‘ innovator”! That is what Shaykh Abdul Hayy did! What evidence does Shaykh Abdul Hayy or any deobandi can present to prove that Mawlana Fazle rasul badayuni ( rh) was encouraging biddah? Which biddah did he support and in which book? Can any deobandi provide the reference? Mere making remarks without evidence is not accepted by Ahlus sunnah.

Mawlana Badayuni wrote Al Mutaqad Al Muntaqad is a classic book on Aqida of Ahlus sunnah wal jamah which was written in Arabic and he refuted all wahabi belief like ‘seeing Allah in direction ‘ etc.

The net result is : Deobandis have just made a remark without supporting it with evidence. Even shias do the same trick.


Deobandi said

“He made takfeer of Shaykh Shah Ismail bin Abdul Ghani al-Dehlawi [r.h] and he acused Shaykh Shah Waliullaah al-Muhaddith al-Dehlawi [r.h] of being a Nasibi Khariji.."

In which book did Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni did this? What is the quote? This is just an accusation unless it is proved and I request any deoandi to provide the EXACT QUOTE with Book reference . It is for everyone to see that this deobandi does not even provide the name of the book ! If he is true in his effort , he should provide book name and exact quote.



Deobandi said

And he accused and spoke ill of Shaykh Ahmad bin Abdul Ahad al-Sirhindi [Mujaddid Alf-e-Sani [r.h]] who was the Imam of the Mujaddidiya and he [Fazl Rasool] would say, "all of them are deviated and are leading others astray”


This is deobandi style statement which has no reference. Readers can see this lie! Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [rh) was associated with all the traqia ( sufi order). He has ijaza ( permission) to make mureed ( disciple) in all the sufi tariqah, including Naqshabndi!

Kindly see the scan of the letter from Tawaliul Anwaar , which Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni wrote to his son ( Mawlana Abdul Qadeer rh) in which he grants him permission in NAQSHBANDIYA tariiqah !

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/16.jpg


This deobandi does not have any reference for these claims ! He is just relying on some secondary resource and that is why he never gives the book name and exact quote !


Deobandi said

“And Hakim al-Ummah Mawlana Thanvi [r.h] writes in Fatawa Imdadiya, vol 6 p78:

"Hadhrat Shah Abdul Aziz [r.h] wrote a book against Isna Ashris named Tuhfa Isna Ashriya and this book created a storm amongst this sect. During those days the state of Audh [in India] was under the rule of Imamis...When the government of Audh were in need of reliable individuals to refute Tuhfa Isna Ashriya then they came across an individual [Fazl Rasul] who was working in Lukhnow at that time. This individual helped the mujtahids of Isna Ashris in answering Tuhfa Isna Ashriya...And he published lies regarding masail [laws/issues] mentioned by Mawlana mausoof [Imam Shah Abdul Aziz]”


Shaykh Ashraf ali thanvi was born in 1280 AH and died in 1362 AH. It means he was nine nine years old when Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni died .

Shaykh Ashraf Ali thanvi says “And he published lies”… but I ask what was the name of that book?
Ashraf ali thanvi has just concoted this statement from his desire and it is a plain lie. In which history book is this mentioned? Which scholar/ historian mentioned this? Morever Shaykh Ashraf ali thanvi himself was a wahabi as he said “ If I had Rs 10000, I would have distributed it and people would have automatically become wahabi.

Scan :
http://i337.photobucket.com/albums/n398/kadu21/164.jpg


The deobandi author should know that the shias invited scholars from Iran to debate with Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddith dehalvi [rh] ! This deobandi does not know that Mawlana Fazle Rasul badayuni followed Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddith dehalvi and held him in high respect . He does not even know that Shah Abdul Aziz was a teacher of Mawlana Fazle Haq khairabadi and Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni was a close friend of Mawlana Fazle haq khairabadi!


Deobandi said

“one can rely on reliable narrators who have mentioned Fazl Rasuls' attacks against Mujaddid Alf-e-Sani [r.h] and labelling him a biddati”

This is a big joke! He has not quoted any book , he has not quoted any narrator , he has not provided the quote and he claims that he has provided reliable narrator!!

Another example of “ baba guru nanak”!





Deobandi writes

Famous historian Professor Ayyub Qadri writes in his book Jang-e-Azaadi 1857, p 63:

"An important point that we have noticed about the publishing of the books of Fazl Rasul Badayuni is that most were published with the help of government officials. It would not be inept to mention here that Molvi Fazl Rasul Badayuni would get paid 17 rupees daily from the state of Hyderabad which was later changed to 11 rupees."


Prof Ayyub Qadri died around 1980 and how did he come to know this? From which book has he taken this? If our deobandi friend has read this book of Prof Ayyub he should provide the source of this information!

And who was the ruler of Hyderabad that time? Does our deobandi friend knows that Hyderabad was the only state which was never under british rule! Does he know that the ruler (nawab) of Hyderabad was one of the mureed ( disciple) of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni!

They say even to copy things one must know the basics of topic and our deobandi friend does not even know that!

Look here , scan from Tawaliul An waar which clearly states that these two nawabs from Hyderabad were the disciple ( mureed) of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [rh]!

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/13.jpg

When the british took over the area of Badayun and all financial aid from muslim rulers to the scholars of Islam was stopped by the british , then the rich mureed ( disciple) of Mawlana Fazle Rasul badayuni (rh) started sending gifts and aid to their teacher!

Our deobandi friend wanted to show that Mawlana was taking money from british! Even a student of history knows that Hyderabad was never under British rule!


Deobandi says

And he writes on page 163 of the same book:

"Mawlana Hyder Ali Tonki [r.h] has written an important point in this regard that Molvi Fazl Rasul Badayuni started to write books against Wahhabis 20 years after the shahadat of Mawlana Ismail shaheed Dehlwi [r.h] in 1831


Readers can see book no 18 above and realize that Shaykh Hyder ali tonki was a wahabi who was refuted by Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni . Shaykh Hyder tonki was against mawlid , Istighata and other issues on which wahabis always have problem.
Shaykh Ismail dehalvi died in 1831 CE and when we add 20 years to it ,it becomes 1851 . As per wahabi scholar Shaykh Tonki , Mawlana Fazle Rasul badayuni (rh) started refuting wahabis only after 1851!!

Can we all see that our deobandi friend has admitted himself that Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni was against wahabis and used to write against wahabis!!!

And his claim of 1851 is wrong , because Al Bawariq al Muhammadiya was published in 1849 and this book is against wahabis . Before this was written , books like Tahqeeqe rafadayn and mawlid were already written , which were against wahabis !


This is the state of Deobandis who post articles ! Readers should judge to see the truth!


If Deobandis consider Prof Ayyun Qadri as an evidnence then they should read these scan from Ayyub Qadris book

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/4.jpg

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/5.jpg

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/6.jpg

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/7.jpg


http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/8.jpg

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/9.jpg


http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/10.jpg
http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/11.jpg

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/12.jpg

Chisti Sabri

Calling non muslims as muslims!

Deobandi scholar Shaykh Rashid Gangohi said that Guru Nanak ( founder of Sikh religion) was not only a muslim but also a disciple ( mureed) and a khalifah of Sayyeduna Fariduddin ganj shahakr ( Rd) !!

This is the hall mark of Deobandis , calling non muslims cas muslims and calling muslims as biddati and mushrik!

DEOBANDIS AND WAHABIS: PART 6 ( LAST PART)

CONCLUSION

1.From this it can be derived that holding all Ahl-e-Sunnat to be polytheists and killing them was lawful and permitted in the eyes of Gangohi Sahib. He also says that the followers of (Ibne Abdul Wahaab) are good men, while all other ulama of Deoband hold them to be Kharijis and rebels. It, thus, becomes clear that Gangohi Sahib believes that Kharijis and rebels are good men.


2. Gangohi Sahib says that their beliefs are excellent and he and his followers are good men, while Husain Ahmad Sahib Tandvi Madni says that his views were evil and his beliefs were most wretched. He considered the killing of Ahle-Sunnat as an act, which brought blessings, and justified taking away of their properties as spoils of war and, as such, lawful. He put the people of the Haramain and the Hijaaz to great hardships until they were forced to flee. He was most insolent towards the pious men of the earlier generations. He was guilty of killing thousands of Musalmaans, and was tyrannical, rebellious, blood-thirsty, and sinful.

3.Now, if Gangohi Sahib is speaking the truth, then Husain Ahmad Sahib Tandvi Madni is speaking the lie. Only one of two can be in the right. Now, a decision about them rests on the followers of the two men.

4. Gangohi Sahib says that their (Najdis) beliefs are excellent. How excellent can be seen in the writings of the Principal of Deoband, Husain Ahmad Sahib t Tandvi Madni, who has listed, serially, examples of the beliefs of the Najdis in F his book, Ash Shahaubus Saaqib! ( As quoted earlier)

THE WORST PART OF THE WHOLE SITUATION IS THIS :

Darul Uloom Deoband has issued this fatwa regarding Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi

"Najdi is called one who is attributed to a great reformer and scholar Hadhrat Shiakh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi (رحمۃ اللہ علیہ). This great reformist was accused of many things; therefore the opponents attribute us to him for irritating us. It is useful to study the book ?Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab ke khilaf propaganda aur Hindustan ke Ulam-e- Haq per uske asaraat? written by Hadhrat Maulana Manzoor Nomani. "

Check fatwa id 5177 at this direct link

http://darulifta-deoband.org/viewfatwa.jsp?ID=5177

So the official Darul Uloom Deoband has now accepted that they love Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi and his Aqida was ' sound" . This has also been accepted by a livig Deobandi Mufti!


The deobandis are pleasing wahabis and deceiving sunni muslim population !





1) Many living Deobandi scholars have adopted the policy of appeasement in this modern time. Going totally against their Officiaal aqida Book Al Muhannad they have praised Ibn Abdal Wahab Najdi and called him a man with correct aqida!

In order to continue deceiving the muslims of Ahlus sunnah wal jamah , they have criticised the " wahabis"in general and have said that wahabis have anthropomorphic belief.

2) This smart move allows deobandis to call themself as' wahabis" when they are with wahabi population and they become sunni when they are with sunni population.


3) The official fatwa from Darul Uloom Deoband has praised and approved Ibn Abdal Wahab al najdi.
Please check here :

http://darulifta-deoband.org/viewfatwa.jsp?ID=5177

Why did they not issue this fatwa in Al Muhannad? Why did deonadi grop hide their aqida when Al muhnnad was presented to sunni arab scholars?


4 Now official Deobandi fatwa is totally against official deobandi aqida as mentioned in ALMUHANNAD.!

5) If Deobandis would have given their fatwa in support of Ibn Abdal Wahab Najdi in their book AL MUHANNAD , no sunni arab scholars would have signed this book! So it is again proved that AL MUHANNAD was written by Deobandis to fool the sunni arab scholars.

6) The scholars of Ahlus sunnah have always told that AL MUHANNAD is not against Hussamul Harmayn as the confused deobandis claim . Rather it is a book written by Deobandis to fool sunni arab scholars.

7) Alhamdulillah , what we sunnis have been saying has now been proved CORRECT by the deobandis themself!!


8) My Deobandi brother should examine the whole situation with open mind and heart. Insha Allah everyone can see the truth

DEOBANDIS AND WAHABIS : PART 5

VIEW OF SHAYKH RASHID GANGOHEE ON IBN ABDUL WAHAB NAJDI AND DEOBANDI JUSTIFICATION

Shaykh Rashid Gangohee was asked


Question: What kind of a person was (Muhammad ibn) Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi?”

“Answer: People call Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab a Wahhabi. He was a good person, and I have heard that he was a follower of the Hanbali School of Islamic law and acted upon the Hadith. He used to prevent people from Shirk and innovation (bid’a), but he was harsh (shadid) in his attitude.”

Please Note: I have heard

THE DEOBANDI JUSTIFICTAION

Read this Justification by a Deobandi where in he is trying to prove that , Shaykh Gangohee had this view because it was based on information which he got ( I HAVE HEARD). Later in this justification it has been tried to prove that Shaykh Gangohee would have chnaged his view , had he known the fact!

Read carefully

The Deobandi Justification says


" Mufti Mahmud al-Hasan al-Gangohi (Allah have mercy on him) states in his Fatawa that, Shaykh Rashid Ahmad (Allah have mercy on him) was initially unaware of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi’s position, because al-Najdi was initially known in the Subcontinent as a reformer of Sunnah, and the one who strived greatly in rejecting Bid’a and establishing the Sunnah. As such, the respected Shaykh also said what he had heard, for a Muslim should always hold good opinions about other Muslims until it is proven otherwise. "

The Deobandi Justification continues

"

Thereafter, the respected Shaykh’s mentor and teacher sent him the copy of Radd al-Muhtar wherein Allama Ibn Abidin (Allah have mercy on him) clearly refuted Muhammad ibn Abd al- Wahhab. Allama Ibn Abidin states:

“…As it has occurred in our times with the followers of Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi, who appeared from Najd and imposed their control over the two sacred Harams. They used to attribute themselves to the Hanbali School but they believed that only they were Muslims and that who ever opposed their beliefs were polytheists (mushrik), thus theyconsidered the killing of those who were from the Ahl al-Sunnah and their scholars to be legitimate, until Allah Most High destroyed their might and power.”

(Radd al-Muhtar, 3/339-340, chapter regarding the followers of Abd al-Wahhab, the Khawarij of our times)


And also

"had Shaykh Rashid Ahmad read what Allama Ibn Abidin stated in his Radd al-Muhtar regarding the Wahhabis, he would surely not have stated what he had in his Fatawa"

. Allama Ibn Abidin (Allah have mercy on him) was geographically closer to Najd, thus he was aware at first hand of what Shaykh Rashid Ahmad, who was living in India, was unaware of. (See: Fatawa Mahmudiyya, 13/411-412)
ANALYSIS


As per this Deobandi Justification, "IF" shaykh Gangohee would have had acess to the Book Durrul Mukhtar ( shami) then he might have not had this GOOD VIEW about Ibn Abdul Wahab!

How ever , this justification also mentions that later Haji Imdadullah (rh ) sent this book to Shaykh Gangohee! So when shaykh Gnagohee got this book , why did he not change his views about Ibn Abdul Wahab?

And the deobandi books are a witness to this fact that Shaykh Gnagohee became an expert in this book Raddul Muhtar! This has been stated in manu deobandi books that shaykh Gnagohee was an expert on Raddul Muhtar and used to issue Fatwa based on this book!

Read this incidence which is mentioned in both Tazkiratur Rashid and Arwahe Salasa !

" It states
" Hazrat Gangohi ( Rashid ahmed) asked his student Mawlana Mohammed Yahya sahib Kandhalvee to look for some ruling in the book Shami . Mawlana Yahya replied that the particular ruling is not present in the book". Hazrat Ganho said how can this be possible? Bring the book to me. The book was brought infront of Hazrat (Rashid Ahmed gangohi).

At that time hazrat ( Rashid ahmed) had already lost his eye sight. He took the book and turned two-third of the pages to the right and one third to the left and opened a page and said " look on the bottom side of left page" . It was found that the ruling was very much present there. Every one was amazed. Hazrat ( Rashid ahmed ) said " Allah has promised me that he will not let anything wrong come come out of my tongue"

( Arwahe salasa, page 292)


Can we see? Even when Shaykh Gnagohee was Blind he could locate a particukar matter mentioned in that book! It means he must have read that book so many times !

But Shaykh Gnagohee did not chnage his view about Ibn Abdul Wahab najdi al Tamimi

DEOBANDIS AND WAHABIS PART 4

View of a Living Deobandi Mufti regarding Ibn Abdul Wahab Najadi and Wahabis


His View about Wahabis

Can you please explain who are Wahabies (is this a sect), are they also Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jammah
I really would like to know who Wahabies are and what they believe in. I'am hanafi and was wondering what is the difference between us and them. Jazzakallahairun selam

A.) The Wahabis, who call themselves Salafis, are a group who had appeared in the last few centuries and hold beliefs contrary to the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa'ah.

They try to pull the wool over our eyes by affiliating themselves with the Salaf (Sahabah and Tabi'en) but in effect their beliefs and practices are completely in contradictory with those of the Salaf.

The Wahabis are in essence Mujassimah (anthropomorphists-Those who attribute
a body to Allah Ta'ala).

They attribute a hand, leg, face etc to Allah Ta'ala, while the illustrious Ulama of the Ahlus sunnah wal Jama'ah hold fast to the belief that Allah knows best the meaning of these words.

Similar is the case with all the sifat (qualities) etc in the Quran ie. the Wahabis take them on there apparent meaning , claiming that interpreting the Quran is not permissible, while we say that Allah knows best what it means or at times we interpret it in a suitable manner.

-The Wahabis reject the permissibility of using a deceased person as a intermediary in dua, while we hold that it is permissible.

-The Wahabis reject the Ambiyaa being alive in their graves

- The Wahabis hold that Allah is really resting on His throne in the sky, while we hold that this is from the Mutashabihaat.(Those unclear statements hose meaning is only known to Allah).

- The Ulama of the Ahlus sunnah wal Jamaa'ah disagree with the destruction of numerous blessed historical landmarks by the Wahabis.

-The Ulama of the Ahlus sunnah wal Jamaa'ah hold that taqleed of one mazhab is necessary, while the Wahabis generally do not adhere to a mazhab and claim that following one imam blindly is Bidah and shirk.

-There are dozens of other differences.


The Wahabis are vehement opponents of the Asharis and Maaturidis, who constitute the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama'ah and are two groups whose beliefs are correct. They also vehemently oppose tawassuf.

It is necessary for us to be on our guard against them as they are very active propagators of their Baatil and false beliefs.


View of the same above Mufti regarding Ibn Abdul Wahab Najadi

[ Compare it with the Official Deobandi view mentioned in AL MUHANNAD and also as stated by Shaykh Tandvi al Deobandi}

Question
What do ulemas of deoband consider about Molana Abdul Wahhab? Do you agree that the present form of wahhbism has nothing to do with teachings of Maulana Abdul Wahhab?



Answer


Your observation is correct. Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhaab [ra] was a reputable and God-fearing Aalim of the eighteenth century aligned to the Hanbali Madhab. Sheikh enjoyed unique acceptance and love across the spectrum of social class. Sheikh, in conjunction with the royal family of the time, was responsible for rekindling the love for the Qur’aan and Sunnah in the populace of the Arabian peninsula. Unfortunately, subsequent to the death of the Sheikh, his opponents embarked on a vehement campaign of concocting erroneous beliefs and views and attributed them to the Sheikh. This, in an attempt to discredit the Sheikh and to bring about discord between his followers.

When these attempts failed miserably, these opponents rescinded and capitalized on the influence that Sheikh’s name enjoyed and the love of the masses. By hijacking his movement and using it as a vehicle to spread their incorrect views and beliefs. For more information, refer to ‘The Life of Shaykh Abdul Wahhaab’ by Sheykh Muhammad Abu Bakr Ghazipuri.

and Allah Ta'ala Knows Best


WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING

Can we see this " deobandi tactical shift"? The official book of Deobandis states that these deobandis have the same belef about Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi which is mentioned in Durrul Mukhtar!

By giving this lie , these Deobandi liars managed a Fatwa from sunni Arab scholars of Arabia .

Now this Deobandi mufti was asked :What do ulemas of deoband consider about Molana Abdul Wahhab?

So let this be known that this deobandi mufti is not only giving his views but also the official view of Deobandis !

But this is totally against the official view ( as in AL MUHANNAD) !

AL MUHANNAD says ibn abdul wahab was a bad man who killed sunnis and this mufti of deobandis say that ibn abdul wahab was a good man !


This is called policy of appeasement ! The Deobandi mufti is smart to praise ibn abdul wahab najdi , but he criticizez wahabis !!

THIS IS YET ANOTHER PROOF THAT AL MUHANNAD WAS WRITTEN TO FOOL THE SUNNI ARAB SCHOLARS!

DEOBANDIS AND WAHABIS: PART 3

More View of scholars of Deoband regarding Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi Al Tamimi


1. This title (Wahaabi) means a person who subscribes to, or is subservient, to the creed of Ibne Abdul Wahaab". (Imdaad-ul-Fataawa), Page 233.

2. On Page 45 of Ashrafus Sawaanih, it is stated thus: "A story is narrated of the times when Ashraf Ali Thanvi Sahib was a teacher at the Madrasah Jaamiul-Uloom, Kanpur. Some women living in the neighbourhood of the Madrasah brought some sweets so that the Holy Qur'aan may be recited and the reward so earned be conveyed. Students of the Madrasah did not do so and ate up the sweets. This created quite a row. When informed of the row, Thanvi Sahib came and told the people in a loud voice, "Brethren! This place is populated by Wahaabis. Don't bring anything here for the sake of faatihah and niyaaz."


3. One Page 192 of the biography of Janab Yoosuf Kandhalvi, it is stated that 'we are staunch Wahaabis."


4. One of the elders of the Deobandi Wahaabi propagandist group, Sheikh-ul-Hadees Muhammad Zakariya Sahib, declares: "I am a more staunch Wahaabi than all of you."—(Biography of Maulana Muhammad Yoosuf Kandhalvi, Page 193, authored by Muhammad Saani Hasni and Manzoor Nu'maani).


5. If I had Rs 10000 I would have distributed it and people would have automatically become WAHABI --

---- Mawlana Ashraf Ali Thanvee ( Al ifadatul Yaumiya)

DEOBANDIS AND WAHABIS: PART 2

VIEW OF DEOBANDI SCHOLARS ON IBN ABDUL WAHAB NAJDI AL TAMIMI

Al-Muhannad, the book of beliefs of the ulama of Deoband, on page 12, contains the following question and answer:

"Question number 12: Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab held the view that shedding the blood of Musalmaans and taking away their property and defiling their honour, all these things were lawful. He also termed them idolaters. He was insolent towards the elders. What is your view of him? And do you (think calling the Ahle Qiblah as infidels is a lawful act? Or do you think that he who does these things belongs to a legitimate sect?

Answer: In our view ( Please note: OUR VIEW ( not My view) and Al Muhanned was sigbed by 40 leading scholars of deoband school of thought) the same verdict applies to them as has been given by the writer of Durr-e-Mukhtaar. And Khawarij are a band of people who waged war against the Imam because they thought him to be guilty of falsehood, that is, idolatry, which justified waging war. For this reason they take the taking of our lives and our property and making our women captives to be lawful. He further held that they were rebels. He also held that they did not Describe them as infidels because this was a matter of interpretation, though a faulty one. And Allamah Shaami, in his marginal notes on the book, has said, "Like it happened in our times when the followers of Ibne Abdul Wahaab sallying forth from Najd overwhelmed Haramain Shareefain. They described themselves as belonging to Hambali creed, but it was their belief that only they were Musalmaans and whoever was against their belief was an idolater and, so, they justified the killing of the Ahle Sunnat and the ulama of the Ahle Sunnat until Almighty Allah deprived them of their ascendancy."

2. Hussein Ahmad Sahib Tandvi Madni says: "Gentlemen' Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab appeared in the Najd in the 13th century A.H., and, because he harboured evil thoughts and held wrong beliefs, he waged war on the Ahl-e-Sunnat Wall Jama'at, sought to force his evil thoughts upon them and considered lawful seizing of their properties as the spoils of war, and killing them, and considered all these acts to bring blessings. He was harsh on the people of the Haramain (Makkah and Madinah) in particular and on the people of the Hijaaz in general. He used most foul language against the pious men of the earlier generations. Because of the atrocities committed by him on them, countless people had to flee the holy cities of Makkah and Madinah, and many of them were martyred by his troops. In short, he was a tyrant, a rebel and an altogether evil person."

(Ash-Shahaubus Saaqib, Page 42)

3. "Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab believed that people all over the world and all Muslims were polytheists and infidels. (Page 44)

4. The Najdis believed, and his followers still believe, that the lives of Prophets (Alihumus Salaam) were limited to the times during which they lived upon this earth. Thereafter, in death, they and other faithfuls are equal. (Page 45)

5. This group holds that having a vision of the blessed Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) and visits to his blessed tomb are bad innovations and unlawful. He also holds as unlawful even journeying in that direction for this purpose. According to some of them, even journeying for the sake of paying a visit to the blessed tomb is like committing fornication. May Allah save us from such evil thoughts! (Page 45)


6. The Wahaabis use most insolent language in respect of Prophethood and the person of the holy Prophet himself (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) and, in their insolence, claim to be the equals of the personality of the holy Prophet, and, according to them, only a little benefit accrued from him during the times he was preaching the Messages of Allah, and no benefits flowed from him after his passing away. And because they think so, they consider as unlawful praying for Allah's forgiveness through his intercession. Their elders also said that praying for Allah's forgiveness through his intercession was unlawful. (May Allah save us from having such thoughts)! But, perhaps, it may be permissible to reproduce such thoughts, for merely reproducing blaspheming words does not by itself constitute blasphemy). They also said that the staff in a man's hand was of greater advantage to him than the glorious personality of the king of the universe (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam), for with a staff in his hand one can defend himself from a dog while the personality of the pride of the universe (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) cannot do even this much for him. (Page 47)

7. The Wahaabis are against performing mystic rites and sophistic practices-meditating, engaging in the remembrance of Allah and thinking about Him, owing allegiance to spiritual guides and the whole system of spiritual guides, and having a mental rapport with the spiritual guides, believing in the doctrine of annihilation and permanent life etc. etc In their view, al' such things are of no consequence, bad innovations and demeaning.

(Page 59, Ash-Shahaubus Saaqib)


8. In Wahaabi belief, following any particular Imam is considered to be blasphemy against the Prophet, and they use wretched and wicked words for the four Imams and their followers, and thus they are alienated from the Ahl-e-Sunnat-Wa-Jama'at and so the non-emulators of India belong to this wicked group. While they claimed to be Hanbalee when they first appeared on the scene, but in many matters they do not follow Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal (Alaihir Rahmah)—

(Page 62, Ash-Shahaabus Saaqib).


9. Through verses Ar-Rahmaanu 'Alal 'Arshis Tawa etc, the Wahaabis try to prove that Allah physically occupies a throne and also make out His dimensions and, therefore, His bodily presence. - (Page 24, Ash-Shahaabus-Saaqib)


10. The Wahaabis of Arabia have often been heard to harshly denounce the expression, "As Salaatu was Salaamu Alaika ya Rasoolal Laah" (Peace and salutation to you, O Allah's Messenger)", and most scathingly condemn and ridicule its use, and hurl most unbecoming language against the people of the Haramain who use such an expression.—(Page 65, Ash-Shahaabus-Saaqib)

11. The wicked Wahaabis harshly denounce sending repeatedly peace and salutation on the mercy to the worlds, and consider reciting Dalaa'ilul Khairuat, Qaseedah Burdah and Qassedah Hamziyah and such like as most detestable and unwarranted. They also consider some couplets of Qaseedah Burdah to be downright blasphemous, as for example the couplet:

Ya Ashrafal Khalqi Maali Man Aloozu Bihi Siwaaka Inda Huloolil Haadisil 'Amami

(O. the best of creations! I have no one To look up to in perilous times like these)

(Page 66, Ash Shahaabus Saaqib)

12. Except for the knowledge by him of Allah's commands, the Wahaabis think the personality of the Last of the Prophets (Alaihis Salaatu Was Salaam) to be devoid of all hidden and true knowledge. (Page 62, Ash-Shahaabus Saaqib)

13. The Wahaabis consider the narration of the birth of the king of the universe (Alaihis-Salaatu-Was-Salaam) itself to be a most reprehensible act and a very bad innovation".

(Page 67, Ash-Shahaabus Saaqib)

DEOBANDIS AND WAHABIS : PART 1

ABOUT IBN ABDUL WAHAB AL NAJDI AL TAMIMI


Page 15, divine text by Imam Mustafa ibn Ahmad ash-Shatti ( Rh)

Translator: Abu Ja`far al-Hanbali

1. Imam Mustafa ibn Ahmed ash – Shatti writes about Ibn Abdul Wahab al Najdi al Tamimi

Some of the major doctrinal positions propounded at variance with Muslim Orthodoxy were as follows

(5) The vast majority of Muslims down through the ages, since the first three generations have slipped into idolatry.

Foot note: Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab said the following: ‘ The best spoken word that could be said was the cause of a Bedouin coming to us one day saying he had heard something about Islam. He said,’ I bear witness that we were kuffar ( he meant all the desert Arabs) and I bear witness that the guard who came to tell us about things is of the people of Islam’. So the man bore witness that he was an unbeliever.’ Sharah Sittah Mawali’min as Sirah,pp 25-26. This indeed shows that this creed was taught to the people. Further could be said by his son and first successor, Abdullah Ala sheikh who stated: ‘Indeed major shirk has become the norm for most of these people due to ignorance spreading and knowledge disappearing.” Al –Kalimat un Nafi atu fil Mukaffirat il Waqi’ah,pp. 15-16.

2. Ibn Abidin al Hanafi (Rh ) writes :


His words and who consider the Companions of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be disbelievers are not a condition for someone to be a kharijite, but rather are a mere clarification of what those who revolted against ‘Ali (Allah Most High be well pleased with him) in fact did. Otherwise, it is enough to be convinced of the unbelief of those they fight against, as happened in our own times with the followers of [Muhammad ibn] ‘Abd al-Wahhab, who came out of the Najd in revolt, and took over the sanctuaries of Mecca and Medina. They followed the Hanbali madhhab, but believed that they were the Muslims, and that those who believed differently than they did were polytheists (mushrikin). On this basis, they held it lawful to kill Sunni Muslims (Ahl al-Sunna) and their religious scholars, until Allah Most High dispelled their forces, and the armies of the Muslims attacked their strongholds and subdued them in 1233 A.H. [1818] (Hashiya radd al-muhtar, 4.262).

( Cited by Shaykh Nuh : http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/nuh/masudq6.htm


3. The Shafi‘i mufti of Mecca, Ahmad ibn Zayni Dahlan (d. 1304/1886), a historian as well as a scholar, recorded the story of the Wahhabis’ takeover of the holy places in a number of books, one of which, his two-volume history al-Futuhat al-Islamiyya [The Islamic conquests], gives the following description of what became perhaps their most famous, and certainly their most lethal ijtihad; namely, that the sunna of tawassul or ‘supplicating Allah through an intermediary’ was shirk:
Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab claimed that his aim in this school of thought he innovated was to make sincere the belief in Allah’s unity (tawhid), and to abjure worshipping false gods (shirk), and that Muslims had been worshipping false gods for six hundred years, and that he had revived their religion for them. He interpreted Qur’anic verses revealed about worshippers of false gods (mushrikin) as referring to those who worship Allah alone…


4. `Allama al-Shaykh Sulayman, elder brother of Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Wahhab: al-Sawa'iq al-Ilahiyya fi al-radd 'ala al-Wahhabiyya ["Divine Lightnings in Answering the Wahhabis] also writes that ibn Andul Wahab was misguided and considered the muslim population to be involved in “ shirk”.