Ashraf Ali Thanvi: Analysis

Ashraf Ali Thanvi al deobandi is one of the top scholars from deobandi cult. He is called as hakim al ummah meaning “the sage of the ummah” by the followers of the deobandi cult.

Few selections from books of this deobandi sage are given below for readers to know the mentality of Ashraf ali thanvi.

It is important to know that Ashraf Ali thanvi al deobandi showed disrespect to prophet in his book hifzul iman , page 7, where he compared the knowledge of the prophet with the knowledge of animals, children and every insane person.

For this anti Islamic writing, two hundred and sixty eight scholars from the Indian subcontinent and thirty three scholars from harmayn sherifain declared the fatwa (verdict) of kufr upon Ashraf ali thanvi al deobandi.


1. The day to day teaching of Ashraf ali thanvi has been collected and published as Al ifadat al Yaumiya. It is also called as Malfuzat hakim al ummah.

On page 255 of this book ( malfooz 410) Ashraf ali thanvi writes:

“The belief ( aeteqad) of normal people is not of much importance. Our Hazrat Mawlana Mohammed Yaqoob sahib used to given an example of belief held by common people. This example is indecent but it suits very well. He ( mawlana yaqoob ) used to say that belief of common people is like the private part of a donkey, when it increases it increases a lot and when it diminishes there is no trace of it. Indeed it is a strange example”




Indeed only a deobandi sage can have this type of example in his book!!


2 In the same book ( malfooz number 43) page 61 , Ashra ali thanvi writes:

“A man told me that he does not get satisfaction/happiness ( maza) when he does dhikr. To which I replied, there is no happiness in dhikr. The happiness is when sperm (mazi) comes out during foreplay with wife.”



This type of examples can be given only by a deobandi sage!!!

3 In the same book, malfooz number 49 , Ashraf ali thanvi al deobandi is condemning the reasoning given by naturist sect. In order to show that how reasoning cannot be justified he writes:

“Like a man told that he used to have dirty relationship with his mother. It was questioned to him that how can he have this? This is a dirty act. To which he replied: “what is the problem in this act? After all once upon a time my whole body was insider her and now only a part of my body goes inside her”.



Ashraf ali thanvi did not feel any shame in giving this example and how can he get ashamed! After all a person who can show disrespect to prophet can go to any extant!
May Allah save this ummah from these types of hakim al ummah and his followers!. Ameen!

4 In the same book page 212 (volume 9), Asharf ali thanvi describes an incidence about his maternal uncle ( mamu).

Ashraf ali thanvi writes:

“Abdur Rahman khan requested mamu to give a speech so that people can be benefited. Uncle did not want to give the speech so he told others that he will put a condition to be fulfilled before making a speech and since condition will not be full filled, I will not make the speech. People asked him , what will be his condition ? To which uncle of ashraf ali thanvee replied that he wants to go naked in the market, with some people pulling his organ from the front , others fingering him from behind and a group of children calling him bharwa, bharwa .” ( bharwa means pimp in urdu).




Indeed, thanvi saheb’s uncle had some innovative idea! But what made ashraf ali thanvee mention this incidence is another point to discuss!


5 Ashrafus sawaneh is a biography of Ashraf ali thanvi, written by his student Ajizul hasan.

On page 64 of this book there is an interesting discussion.

“Once I told Hazrat( Ashraf ali thanvee sahib) that I have one ugly wish that I should have been woman and should have got married to you. To which hazrat ( ashraf ali thanvi) replied that I will get reward for this thought”

Here we see that this maulvi gets reward for getting a thought of marrying ashraf ali thanvi! But as per deobandis celeberating mawlid, doing ithal e sawab on food and reciting salwat upon our beloved prophet ( sal allahu alayhi wa sallam) before adhan , everything is a biddah and will not give an reward!!

This is the true face of deobandism!

6 Asharf Ali thanvee writes:


“A very pious and religious man had this “ Kashf” that Hazrat Ayesha (Rd) is going to visit my house . This pious man informed me about his ‘kashf”. My mind gave me this answer that I am also going to get a young aged girl in marriage because when prophet married Ayesha Rd , he was above fifty and she was of very less age.

( Risala Al Imdad. Month of Safar , 1335 AH)

The wives of the prophet ( sal Allahu alaihi wa sallam) is the mother of all the believers .

No muslim will even think of such dirty interpretation of kashf or dream.
But Deobandis consider prophet as ‘elder brother” and they say prophet should be given only as much respect as it is given to an elder brother.

What is the result?

We can see this dirty interpretation in which he uses the word” KAMSIN AURAT HAAT AAYEGEE” which will transate into” I will get hold of a young/ virgin woman”.

Lanatullahi alal kaazibeen .




Read this Urdu wordings from the pen of Ashraf Ali Thanvee

“ Ek zakir saleh ko maqshoof hua ki haqeer ke ghar hazrat Ayesha aaney wali hain.Unhoney mujhsey kaha. Mear zehan usee mayyan usee taraf muntaqil hua ki KAMSIN AURAT HAAT AAYEGEE., is munasibat sey ki jan huzoor sal allahu alaihi wa sallam ney Hazrat Ayesha sey nikah kiya to huzoor ka sun shreef pachaas sey zyada tha aur hazrat Ayesha bahut kam umar ki theen”


7 Ashraf ali thanvee also wrote ‘ behisti zewar’ ( heavenly ornaments) which contains highly objectionable issues regarding females. Deobandis have removed that section so the present edtion of this book does not contain these issues.

Insha Allah in future this topic will be discussed.

Few lines by brother shardil. (Slight edition from my side)


jin ke naam se zuban ho ghaandi deobandi deobandi
jin ke kaam meh sheetan ki dhandi
deobandi deobandi
jin bunyad ha angraiz ki mansobabandi
deobandi deobandi
jin ka asol ho deshatpasandi
deobandi deobandi
jin ke hath hain khoon muslaman se rangini
deobandi deobandi
kon hain petro dallor ke jihadi
deobandi deobandi
Islam ke dhushman azali
deobandi deobandi

Abortion row shakes Brazil opinion

By Gary Duffy
BBC News, Brazil

The issue of abortion in Brazil has been making headlines not just in South America's biggest country, but around the world.

The controversy began when news emerged from Pernambuco, a poor state in the north-east of Brazil, that a nine-year-old girl who had been raped was pregnant with twins.

It is alleged that she had been sexually abused for years by her stepfather, who is also suspected of sexually assaulting an older disabled sister. He is now in prison.

Public interest in the case soared when the local Catholic archbishop tried to block the girl from having an abortion.

Brazilian law allows abortion only if there is a risk to the life of the mother or in cases of rape. Doctors said the girl met both those conditions, and said she was so small her uterus was not big enough to carry one baby, never mind two.

Opponents of abortion say the girl could have safely had a Caesarean section.

In the end the abortion went ahead and the local archbishop, Jose Cardoso Sobrinho, said all those adults involved - the mother and the medical team - had been excommunicated


The archbishop later insisted it was not he who was ordering the excommunication, but that he had been simply restating the teachings of the Church.

His statement attracted widespread condemnation, led by Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who said as a "Christian and a Catholic" he deeply regretted the bishop's conservative attitude.

Archbishop Sobrinho then added to the storm of protest by saying that while the stepfather had allegedly carried out a "heinous act", excommunication did not automatically apply to him.

The controversy then spread to Rome where it appears to have provoked a surprising divergence of opinion at the highest levels.

Unforeseen consequences

One senior Vatican official appeared to back the Brazilian archbishop and then another to sharply contradict him.

It seems, however, the controversy may have led to other consequences in Brazil that Archbishop Sobrinho did not foresee, and which almost certainly he would not have welcomed.

Those who would like see a more liberal law on abortion say the fact that the Brazilian state - from the president down - rallied so firmly to the side of the doctors involved in this case will give renewed courage to their medical colleagues across the country.

Even in circumstances where abortion is legal, it seems doctors here have proceeded nervously, fearful some say of a negative reaction from the media or the Roman Catholic Church

-----------------------

Read more here..

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7978696.stm

-------------------

If the same news against abortion would have come from some muslim family , the media would have used every possible word to blame it on ISLAM.

------------------

Mulla Hussain Khabbaz

A deobandi said

Allamah Basheer al-Deen Usmani Qinnawji [r.h] has brought forward many statements of ulama in his Tafheem al-Masail regarding istighatha with the belief of hadhir nadhir. Fatwa of Shaykh Hamid al-Deen Nagori [r.h] was posted earlier.

1. He also mentions a fatwa of Mullah Hussain Khabaaz [r.h]:

واز كلمات كفر است ندا كردن اموات غائبان را بگمان آنكه حاضر اند مثل يا رسول اللّه ويا عبدالقادر ومانند آں

"To call upon the dead with the belief that they are hadhir[listening to us] by uttering statements like Ya Rasool Allah and Ya Abdul Qadir etc are kufr."

[Tafheem al-Masail ba-hawala Maftah al-Quloob from Jawahir al-Tauheed, p.273]

So the book which our deobandi friend read was Jawahir al Tauheed. The author of this book is Shaykh Ghulamullah Khan , who is from the mamati sect of deobandi. They consider prophet to be dead and do not belief life in grave for prophet ( sal allahu alayhi wa sallam).

Shaykh Ghulamullah Khan writes that he took the reference from the book Tafheem al masail. This book was written by the wahabi scholar Shaykh Basheerud deen qannawji .

Basheerudeen qannawji writes in his book that he took this reference from a book Miftah al Quloob

So we have seen that as per our deobandi friend the original source of the quote was a book called Miftah al quloob. Though he could not provide the author of this book.

Fine.



This deobandi later gave a scan and some details about Mulla Hussain Al Khabbaz and said




What a challenge by mr. takfiri! He is under the delusion that since he has no idea how great this allamah is, then no body else does. His posts are full of errors. I am sure he will feel like a fool, that he is, after seeing the scans below.

Mullah Hussain Khabaaz [r.h] is mentioned on 523-524 of Nuzhat al-Khawatir. He is referred to as al-Shaykh, al-Salih, al-Faqih by Allamah Abdul Hay Lukhnawi al-Hussaini [r.h].

He was from Kashmir and he travelled to Dehli and there he benefitted from Abd ash-Shahid al-Ahrari [r.h] for a long period of time. After that he returned to Kashmir and passed away in 1050 hijri.

The quote is in his book Hidayat al-A'ma which is in manuscript form in 288 folios in Indian Kashmir”.


So now our deobandi friend said that the quote is present in a book called Hidayatul Al A’ma which was written by Mulla Hussain Khabbaz and the manuscript of this is kept in Kashmir.

Fine.

Readers can see that our friend is not sure that this quote is present in which book? He is not sure whether it is present in Miftah al quloob ( whose author he is unaware) or whether it is present in Hidatayul A’ma written by Mulla Hussain Khabbaz and the manuscript of which is in Kashmir.


Let us now try to investigate the truth of this matter.

1.The original source which our deobandi friend could quote through secondary reference is that of wahabi scholar Basheeruddin qannawji in his book Tafheem al masail.

2.Later our friend says that this quote is present in Hidayatul Al Ama.

Analysis.

Our deobandi friend is wrong.

1.Shaykh Baheeruddin qannawji was a student of wahabi king pin of India , Nazeer Hussain Dehalvee and he was the first person who gave this reference in his book Fatwa e Naziriya.

See the scan followed by translation





Question : Is it permissible to say Ya Rasul Allah at any other place except near the grave of prophet?

Answer : To utter this word “Ya Rasul Allah “is calling prophet, and only he who is hadhir ( physically present) is called, so the belief of this person is that prophet is present every where and this is not possible except by all encompassing knowledge [Ilm Muhit] and this all encompassing knowledge [Ilm Muhit] is a especiality of Allah and to affirm this type of knowledge for any one else is shirk.
Mulla Hussain Khabbaz has written in his book Miftah Al Quloob that to call those dead who are not physically present [Amwaat Ghaybaat] with the belief that they are physically present [ Hadhir],like saying Ya Rasul Allah and Ya Shaykh Abd Al Qadir Gilani etc is kufr . That is why it is written in the books of fiqh that if a man marries with Allah and messenger [ rasul] as witness ,then that marriage will not be valid ( will not take place) and the person who goes for this type of marriage will become a kafir because this man has a belief that prophet is aware of the knowledge of the unseen ( Ilm Ghayb) [ Bahr Ar Raiq]…..


During those days when this was printed , at that time itself it was asked by sunnis who is this Mulla Khabbaz and Nazeer Hussain did not give any sufficient reply.

2. Basheeruddin Qannawji took this quote from his teachers books and he also failed to provide any information about Mulla Hussain Khabbaz. Instead of quoting his teacher , he directly mentions the original source![ Miftah Al Quloob]

3. What our deobandi friend did was he found out a scholar wuth the name Mulla Hussain al Khabbaz al Kashmiri and then found out which book is written by this scholar and he smartly said that this quote is present in that book whose manuscript is in Kashmir! Where as this quote is present in Miftah Al Quloob as per two wahabi scholars from whose book our deobandi friend took his reference.

4. This Mawlana Hussain Al khabbaz is mentioned by Shaykh Abdul Hayy al Hasani ( not Husseni as our deobandi friend has mentioned) in his biographical work Nuzhatul Khawatir as a Naqshbandi sufi who wrote a book called Hidayatul Al Amma.

Indeed this Mulla Hussain Al Khabbaz al Kashmiri did write a book called Hidayatul Al Amma which is preserved in Srinagar in manuscript form in 287 folios [Persian]. This work was does not contain any such quote and no one ever gave this reference. It deals with Naqshbandi sufi teachings.

Please note both the wahabi scholars ( Nazeer Hussain and his student qannawji) have cited Miftah Al Quloob to be the source of this quote.


Also note that Shaykh Abdul Hayy does not mention any other book by this Mulla Hussain Al Khabbaz Al kashmiri except Hidayatul al Ama.

The fact is Mulla Hussain Al Khabbaz wrote other book also on Naqshbandi sufi teaching. The name of the book is hasht Sharait [ Eight conditions]. In this Persian work Mulla Hussain al Khabbaz Al Kashmiri has given eight condtions for a disciple to progress in the path of Tasawwuf.

scan








Since Shaykh Abdul Hayy al Hasani has mentioned only one book by this scholar , our deobandi friend ASSUMED that this quote MUST be present in this book !

By giving this reference he contradicted himself because earlier he said this quote is present in Miftah Al Quloob ! But he did not know who wrote this book!


Please note this Mulla Hussain Al Khabbaz al Kashmiri is the same person who introduced Imam Rabbani [rd] to Baqi Billah [rd] as mentioned by Imam Rabbani in his maktoob and also written by other scholars and historians.



There is a perian work named Miftah Al Quloob whose manuscript is in US [ details missing,author un known] and this work dealing with central asian kings like Mahmud Sultan, Qasim Sultan, Sultan Ahmad Mirza, 'Abd al-Rahman Tarkhan, and Imam Qali Khan. Some of the place mentioned in this work is Samarqand, Qal'at Arquq, and Qal'at Haji Tarkhan



By presenting this analysis my intention is to highlight that how some people lack in research and present wrong information on internet. Once this is done , other people just rely on this wrong information and spread lies on internet.

Readers can see that how our deobandi friend had to self contradict himself in order to keep his wrong view upright!.


And as I said before Mulla Hussain Khabbaz says “with the belief that they are physically present (Hadhir)”. The muslims do not use that word hadhir ( physically present) for Allah, nor do they have this belief that prophet is physically present every where.

So that particular point remains null and void while discussing this issue,no matter who wrote this and in which book.

Also there is another scholar with the name Ahmed bin Hussain Al Khabbaz who lived some where in 7th islamic century. No more details could be traced and it is not required here since the issue is clear now.


May Allah protect all the scholars of Ahlus sunnah wal jamah who are the true inheritors of our prophet [ sal allahu alauhi wa sallam] and who are working hard to help this ummah to remain on the true path. Ameen

Abdullah Chisti Sabri
28th Rabi Al Awaal 1430
26 March 2009

deobandi mufti

scan 5

SCAN 4

scan3

scan2

Shaykh Thanvi commiting shirk???

Shaykh Ashraf ali thanvi says
" ( O Pophet!) you are the one who reveals what is hidden in our heart".

Now this is clear that Shaykh Ashraf ali thanvee al deobandi is attributing the knwoledge of unseen to prophet ! ( Hayatul Muslimeen,page 9 )
( how else will prophet come to know the secret of heart??)




Please recall , Imam e rabbani of the deobandis , Shaykh Rashid Gangohi said
"any one who says prophet was given the knowledge of the unseen , then he is in shirk"

( Fatwa Rashdiya)


If the fatwa of imam e rabbani of the deoabandis is correct , then shaykh Ashraf ali thanvee commiited shirk!

2. Shaykh Ashraf ali thnavee further writes
" (O prophet) you are the one who provides relief from difficulty to those in need "

Is it not clear that Shaykh Ashraf ali thanvi is calling prophet as Mushkil Kusha.?
( remover of difficulty)

The "shahid" of the deobandis Ismail Dehalvi who killed innocent sunni muslims , wrote in his tafwiyatul iman
" if any one considers besides Allah to provide relief ( from difficulty),then they are in shirk".

So now Shaykh Ashraf ali thanvi has commited shirk as per Ismail dehalvi.


3. Hakim Al Ummah of the deobandis , Shaykh Ashraf ali thanvi writes
" ( O prophet! ) if you hide ( ghayab) or become absent then death will come and world will go into darkness"

Here Shaykh Ashraf ali thanvee is accepting prophet to be " Hazir and Nazir"!

The last will of Shaykh Thanvi! !

The" hakimul Ummah" of the Deobandis loved money through out his life!

He said " if I had Rupees 10,000 , I would have distributed among the people and they would have automatically become wahabis !
[ scan provided earlier in blog ]

But what was the last will of shaykh Thanvi?

Read it , from his biogrpahy

Shaykh Ashraf Ali Thanvi says :
" Take care of (first)wife after I am dead.Twenty people should contribute Rupee one each and should give it to my wife after I am dead...

And this humable man ( haqeer) married another woman in last Ramadhan in 1334 AH , so take care of her also after my death. Try to arrange Twenty Rupees monthly for her , or even Rupees Ten will do. You can also distribute Rupees fifteen monthly to my both wife after my death!

So this was the state of Shaykh Ashraf Ali thanvi who said in his book Hifzul iman
" The knowledge which prophet had , that type ( aysa) of knowledge is also possessed by lunatics, any tom and harry , child or any four legged animal"

For his filthy comment, showing disrespect to propjet , thirty three scholars of Makkah and Medina and two hundred and sixty eight scholars from Indian sub continet issued fatwa of Kufr on him.

Monthly allotment of Shaykh Tahnvi !

The Deobandi sect was divided into two political group before 1947. The first group was led by Shaykh Hussein Tandvi who was a blind follower of Gandhiji. He used to wear cotton ( khaddar) clothes and issued a verdict that all the deceased should be wrapped in cotton sheet only! This was his love for Gandhiji who was propogating the use of cotton clothes. This group was called Congress.

The other group was led by Shaykh Shabbir Ahmed , who was against Shaykh Hussein Tandvi. This group was supporting Muslim league.

Both the groups wanted to take control of Deoband. Many times they engaged in verbal fights and correspondece.

In one such reply , which is mentioned in their own document , MUKALAMUTUSSADARIAN , PAGE 10-11 , it is mentioned
" Mawlana Shabbir Ahmed Al Deobandi, president Jmaitaul Islam Calcutta, wrote in refutation to Mawlana Hifzur rehman , that Mawlana Ashraf Ali sahab , was a respected figure for both the groups. About him . many people have told that he used to take RUPEES SIX HUNDRED MONTHELY FROM ( BRITISH) GOVERNMENT'

Another Fabrication in Tahdhir al-Nas

The Deobandis have done it again! The book “ Tahdhir al-Nas” which was written by their own scholar Shaykh Qasim Nanotvee, has been tempered again by Deobandis.

It is the same book upon which Fatwa of Kufr was issued by two hundred and sixty leading scholars of India and thirty three leading scholars from Makkah al muazzama and Medina al munawara..

Original Translation

"Prophets are higher /chosen one among their followers( Ummati) only in knowledge. When it comes to good deeds, the ummati( followers) attain the equal status of prophets and some times they go above them "










In the fabricated version it reads

“
"Prophets are higher /chosen one among their followers( Ummati). When it comes to good deeds, the ummati( followers) attain the equal status of prophets and some times they go above them "

Deobandis have deleted “ Only in Knowledge”!

Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni Rh

'O believers! If any disobedient comes to you with any news make a strict inquiry lest you may hurt any people improperly then remain repenting on what you have done. ( 49: 6)

http://www.ahadees.com/english-surah-49.html

It has been an old trick of enemies of Islam to spread rumor and cause confusion among the muslims. Shia and Deobandi , both these deviant sect present false history to the muslim population. Shaykh Rashid Gangohi, who is called ‘Imam e Rabbani” by the Deobandis, said

“ Guru Nanak was the “Khalifah ”[student] of Fariduddeen ganj shakar[ rh] . Since he used to be in the state of ecstasy, muslims did not pay attention to him “
[ Tazkiratur Rashid ]

Imam e Rabbani of the deobandis also said
‘ Guru Nanak was a muslim .‘

Scan :

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/1.jpg

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/2.jpg

This is such a big lie that any lay person can check and see the truth. Baba Fariduddeen Ganj Sahakr [ Radi Allahu taa’la] was born in 1175 CE and died in 1263 CE. Guru Nank , the founder of Sikh religion was born in 1469 CE and died in 1539 CE. There can not be any meeting between these two person ! But the deobandis are so full with love for their “imam e rabbani’ that , they accept this lie to be a fact and still publish that lie in their book !

This is the state of Shaykh Rashid Gangohi , who is one of the top leader of Deobandi sect! This statement not only shows how poor was Shaykh Rashid Ahmed in history , but also , how he used to quote things without any reference! This characteristic of making statements without providing any evidence is a special mark of this deobandi sect!


In past this deobandi made many claims which was refuted and can be read on marifah forums ,under Ahlus sunnah wal jamah section. [ Subcontinent polemics , can be read only by registered members of marifah forums]

This deobandi made more than fifteen post attacking great scholar of Islam , Fazle Rasul Badayuni [rh] and in none of his post he provided any detail about this scholar. This is sufficient to know that this deobandi is not aware of history , like Mawlana Rashid gangohi !

Before I start refuting this deobandi ,I would like to inform that Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni al Uthmani [Rh] was one of the great scholar of Islam who was born in India , in the year 1213 AH and died In 1289 AH. The deobandi who wasted his time in attacking this scholar , could not provide this small detail in any of his post ! Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [rh] was from the well known Uthmani family of Badayun [ India ] and one of the greatest scholar of his time. His knowledge, piety and fame can be realized by the fact that Imam Ahmed Raza Khan Barelwi [rh] went to him to become his disciple ( mureed). Mawlana Fazle rasul Badayuni [rh] , instead sent Imam Ahmed Raza Khan [Rh] to Syed Aale Rasul [Rh] ( in the town of Marhara ) who was another great scholar of that time. Imam Ahmed Raza Khan wrote three hundred and thirteen (313) couplets in praise of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni {rh}


A deobandi said

“Mawlana Hakim Syed Lukhnawi [r.h / father of Shaykh Abul Hassan Ali Nadawi [r.h]] writes in Nuzhat al-Khawatir about Fazl Rasul Badayuni:

"He was a faqih who was argumentative and very biased in his beliefs, in constant opposition of the ulama, most far away from the sunnah and an aid to biddah, encountered the people of haqq with his lies and innovations and a lover of the World.



Our deobandi friend should know that that Hakim Abdul Hay lucknawi was born in 1286 AH and died in 1341 AH. It means he was only three years old when Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni died . So what is the source of this information which he is quoting? From whom did he “hear’ this? In which book did he read this? It seems deobandis are not aware of the basic rule of history. If some one makes a remark about an historical incidence or a person , then it should be supported with a strong evidence, other wise it does not hold any weight. Even if a contemporary scholar makes a remark about another person , he should provide evidence to support his remark and when some one who is not even a contemporary scholar makes a comment , he needs to bring strong evidence to support his claim.

Hakim Abdul Hayy was a wahabi scholar from India, who was against four school of fiqh and sufi tariqah. He supported Hindu view in the dispute of Babari masjid. In his historical biographical work’ Nuzhat al khawatir wa bahjat al masami wal nawazir “, he has made very wrong and biased comments in Vol 6 and 7 about scholars of Ahlus sunnah . But these comments hold no weight , as he has not provided any reference to support his claim.


Deobandi said

“He was a faqih who was argumentative and very biased in his beliefs, in constant opposition of the ulama, most far away from the sunnah and an aid to biddah, encountered the people of haqq with his lies and innovations and a lover of the World.”


It seems Shaykh Abdul Hayy lucknawi did not know which was the first book written on the life of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [ Rh]. And our deobandi friend would not even have thought of this question , before writing his article!

The first book which was written on the life history of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [Rh] was “ Tawaliul anwaar fi mahamad akmalul kamileen al abraar’. It was written by Mawlana Anwar al Haq uthmani ( student of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni) and was first published in 1297 AH , just seven years after the death of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [ Rh]

Scan

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/3.jpg

To realize why Shaykh Abdul Hayy made those remarks , it is sufficient to see the books which Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [ Rh] wrote.

Here is the list from “Tawaliul Anwaar’


http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/14.jpg


http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/15.jpg

1. Tahqeeq rafadayn—This was written when wahabis attacked Hanafis stating rafadyan is a “must” and hanafis have no evidence for not doing rafadayn.

2 A booklet on Mawlid.
4. Sharah Fususl hikam

5 A booklet on Tasawwuf : Written in Makkah al muazzamah on the request of Shaykh Abdul Aziz makki .

6. A booklet on “wahdatul wajood”
7 Al mutaqad al muntaqad.
9. A booklet describing life history of scholars of qadri tariqah.

13 Book dealing with permissibility of saying “ Ya Rasul Allah” .
14 Refuting Ishaq dehalvi ( on his attack on mawlid and tasawwuf)
15 Al bawariqul muhammediya : Refuting wahabis
16 Evidence of ‘shafaat” ( intercession)
18 Refuting wahabi scholar haider ali tonki
19 Virtues of “ tabarruk” ( holy relics)
20 . Sayf al jabbar—perhaps one of the best refutation of wahabi sect

21 On mawlid.

If any wahabi looks at this list , he will definitely call the author as ‘ innovator”! That is what Shaykh Abdul Hayy did! What evidence does Shaykh Abdul Hayy or any deobandi can present to prove that Mawlana Fazle rasul badayuni ( rh) was encouraging biddah? Which biddah did he support and in which book? Can any deobandi provide the reference? Mere making remarks without evidence is not accepted by Ahlus sunnah.

Mawlana Badayuni wrote Al Mutaqad Al Muntaqad is a classic book on Aqida of Ahlus sunnah wal jamah which was written in Arabic and he refuted all wahabi belief like ‘seeing Allah in direction ‘ etc.

The net result is : Deobandis have just made a remark without supporting it with evidence. Even shias do the same trick.


Deobandi said

“He made takfeer of Shaykh Shah Ismail bin Abdul Ghani al-Dehlawi [r.h] and he acused Shaykh Shah Waliullaah al-Muhaddith al-Dehlawi [r.h] of being a Nasibi Khariji.."

In which book did Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni did this? What is the quote? This is just an accusation unless it is proved and I request any deoandi to provide the EXACT QUOTE with Book reference . It is for everyone to see that this deobandi does not even provide the name of the book ! If he is true in his effort , he should provide book name and exact quote.



Deobandi said

And he accused and spoke ill of Shaykh Ahmad bin Abdul Ahad al-Sirhindi [Mujaddid Alf-e-Sani [r.h]] who was the Imam of the Mujaddidiya and he [Fazl Rasool] would say, "all of them are deviated and are leading others astray”


This is deobandi style statement which has no reference. Readers can see this lie! Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [rh) was associated with all the traqia ( sufi order). He has ijaza ( permission) to make mureed ( disciple) in all the sufi tariqah, including Naqshabndi!

Kindly see the scan of the letter from Tawaliul Anwaar , which Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni wrote to his son ( Mawlana Abdul Qadeer rh) in which he grants him permission in NAQSHBANDIYA tariiqah !

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/16.jpg


This deobandi does not have any reference for these claims ! He is just relying on some secondary resource and that is why he never gives the book name and exact quote !


Deobandi said

“And Hakim al-Ummah Mawlana Thanvi [r.h] writes in Fatawa Imdadiya, vol 6 p78:

"Hadhrat Shah Abdul Aziz [r.h] wrote a book against Isna Ashris named Tuhfa Isna Ashriya and this book created a storm amongst this sect. During those days the state of Audh [in India] was under the rule of Imamis...When the government of Audh were in need of reliable individuals to refute Tuhfa Isna Ashriya then they came across an individual [Fazl Rasul] who was working in Lukhnow at that time. This individual helped the mujtahids of Isna Ashris in answering Tuhfa Isna Ashriya...And he published lies regarding masail [laws/issues] mentioned by Mawlana mausoof [Imam Shah Abdul Aziz]”


Shaykh Ashraf ali thanvi was born in 1280 AH and died in 1362 AH. It means he was nine nine years old when Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni died .

Shaykh Ashraf Ali thanvi says “And he published lies”… but I ask what was the name of that book?
Ashraf ali thanvi has just concoted this statement from his desire and it is a plain lie. In which history book is this mentioned? Which scholar/ historian mentioned this? Morever Shaykh Ashraf ali thanvi himself was a wahabi as he said “ If I had Rs 10000, I would have distributed it and people would have automatically become wahabi.

Scan :
http://i337.photobucket.com/albums/n398/kadu21/164.jpg


The deobandi author should know that the shias invited scholars from Iran to debate with Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddith dehalvi [rh] ! This deobandi does not know that Mawlana Fazle Rasul badayuni followed Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddith dehalvi and held him in high respect . He does not even know that Shah Abdul Aziz was a teacher of Mawlana Fazle Haq khairabadi and Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni was a close friend of Mawlana Fazle haq khairabadi!


Deobandi said

“one can rely on reliable narrators who have mentioned Fazl Rasuls' attacks against Mujaddid Alf-e-Sani [r.h] and labelling him a biddati”

This is a big joke! He has not quoted any book , he has not quoted any narrator , he has not provided the quote and he claims that he has provided reliable narrator!!

Another example of “ baba guru nanak”!





Deobandi writes

Famous historian Professor Ayyub Qadri writes in his book Jang-e-Azaadi 1857, p 63:

"An important point that we have noticed about the publishing of the books of Fazl Rasul Badayuni is that most were published with the help of government officials. It would not be inept to mention here that Molvi Fazl Rasul Badayuni would get paid 17 rupees daily from the state of Hyderabad which was later changed to 11 rupees."


Prof Ayyub Qadri died around 1980 and how did he come to know this? From which book has he taken this? If our deobandi friend has read this book of Prof Ayyub he should provide the source of this information!

And who was the ruler of Hyderabad that time? Does our deobandi friend knows that Hyderabad was the only state which was never under british rule! Does he know that the ruler (nawab) of Hyderabad was one of the mureed ( disciple) of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni!

They say even to copy things one must know the basics of topic and our deobandi friend does not even know that!

Look here , scan from Tawaliul An waar which clearly states that these two nawabs from Hyderabad were the disciple ( mureed) of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [rh]!

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/13.jpg

When the british took over the area of Badayun and all financial aid from muslim rulers to the scholars of Islam was stopped by the british , then the rich mureed ( disciple) of Mawlana Fazle Rasul badayuni (rh) started sending gifts and aid to their teacher!

Our deobandi friend wanted to show that Mawlana was taking money from british! Even a student of history knows that Hyderabad was never under British rule!


Deobandi says

And he writes on page 163 of the same book:

"Mawlana Hyder Ali Tonki [r.h] has written an important point in this regard that Molvi Fazl Rasul Badayuni started to write books against Wahhabis 20 years after the shahadat of Mawlana Ismail shaheed Dehlwi [r.h] in 1831


Readers can see book no 18 above and realize that Shaykh Hyder ali tonki was a wahabi who was refuted by Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni . Shaykh Hyder tonki was against mawlid , Istighata and other issues on which wahabis always have problem.
Shaykh Ismail dehalvi died in 1831 CE and when we add 20 years to it ,it becomes 1851 . As per wahabi scholar Shaykh Tonki , Mawlana Fazle Rasul badayuni (rh) started refuting wahabis only after 1851!!

Can we all see that our deobandi friend has admitted himself that Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni was against wahabis and used to write against wahabis!!!

And his claim of 1851 is wrong , because Al Bawariq al Muhammadiya was published in 1849 and this book is against wahabis . Before this was written , books like Tahqeeqe rafadayn and mawlid were already written , which were against wahabis !


This is the state of Deobandis who post articles ! Readers should judge to see the truth!


If Deobandis consider Prof Ayyun Qadri as an evidnence then they should read these scan from Ayyub Qadris book

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/4.jpg

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/5.jpg

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/6.jpg

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/7.jpg


http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/8.jpg

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/9.jpg


http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/10.jpg
http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/11.jpg

http://i363.photobucket.com/albums/oo72/dadu21/12.jpg

Chisti Sabri

Calling non muslims as muslims!

Deobandi scholar Shaykh Rashid Gangohi said that Guru Nanak ( founder of Sikh religion) was not only a muslim but also a disciple ( mureed) and a khalifah of Sayyeduna Fariduddin ganj shahakr ( Rd) !!

This is the hall mark of Deobandis , calling non muslims cas muslims and calling muslims as biddati and mushrik!

DEOBANDIS AND WAHABIS: PART 6 ( LAST PART)

CONCLUSION

1.From this it can be derived that holding all Ahl-e-Sunnat to be polytheists and killing them was lawful and permitted in the eyes of Gangohi Sahib. He also says that the followers of (Ibne Abdul Wahaab) are good men, while all other ulama of Deoband hold them to be Kharijis and rebels. It, thus, becomes clear that Gangohi Sahib believes that Kharijis and rebels are good men.


2. Gangohi Sahib says that their beliefs are excellent and he and his followers are good men, while Husain Ahmad Sahib Tandvi Madni says that his views were evil and his beliefs were most wretched. He considered the killing of Ahle-Sunnat as an act, which brought blessings, and justified taking away of their properties as spoils of war and, as such, lawful. He put the people of the Haramain and the Hijaaz to great hardships until they were forced to flee. He was most insolent towards the pious men of the earlier generations. He was guilty of killing thousands of Musalmaans, and was tyrannical, rebellious, blood-thirsty, and sinful.

3.Now, if Gangohi Sahib is speaking the truth, then Husain Ahmad Sahib Tandvi Madni is speaking the lie. Only one of two can be in the right. Now, a decision about them rests on the followers of the two men.

4. Gangohi Sahib says that their (Najdis) beliefs are excellent. How excellent can be seen in the writings of the Principal of Deoband, Husain Ahmad Sahib t Tandvi Madni, who has listed, serially, examples of the beliefs of the Najdis in F his book, Ash Shahaubus Saaqib! ( As quoted earlier)

THE WORST PART OF THE WHOLE SITUATION IS THIS :

Darul Uloom Deoband has issued this fatwa regarding Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi

"Najdi is called one who is attributed to a great reformer and scholar Hadhrat Shiakh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi (رحمۃ اللہ علیہ). This great reformist was accused of many things; therefore the opponents attribute us to him for irritating us. It is useful to study the book ?Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab ke khilaf propaganda aur Hindustan ke Ulam-e- Haq per uske asaraat? written by Hadhrat Maulana Manzoor Nomani. "

Check fatwa id 5177 at this direct link

http://darulifta-deoband.org/viewfatwa.jsp?ID=5177

So the official Darul Uloom Deoband has now accepted that they love Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi and his Aqida was ' sound" . This has also been accepted by a livig Deobandi Mufti!


The deobandis are pleasing wahabis and deceiving sunni muslim population !





1) Many living Deobandi scholars have adopted the policy of appeasement in this modern time. Going totally against their Officiaal aqida Book Al Muhannad they have praised Ibn Abdal Wahab Najdi and called him a man with correct aqida!

In order to continue deceiving the muslims of Ahlus sunnah wal jamah , they have criticised the " wahabis"in general and have said that wahabis have anthropomorphic belief.

2) This smart move allows deobandis to call themself as' wahabis" when they are with wahabi population and they become sunni when they are with sunni population.


3) The official fatwa from Darul Uloom Deoband has praised and approved Ibn Abdal Wahab al najdi.
Please check here :

http://darulifta-deoband.org/viewfatwa.jsp?ID=5177

Why did they not issue this fatwa in Al Muhannad? Why did deonadi grop hide their aqida when Al muhnnad was presented to sunni arab scholars?


4 Now official Deobandi fatwa is totally against official deobandi aqida as mentioned in ALMUHANNAD.!

5) If Deobandis would have given their fatwa in support of Ibn Abdal Wahab Najdi in their book AL MUHANNAD , no sunni arab scholars would have signed this book! So it is again proved that AL MUHANNAD was written by Deobandis to fool the sunni arab scholars.

6) The scholars of Ahlus sunnah have always told that AL MUHANNAD is not against Hussamul Harmayn as the confused deobandis claim . Rather it is a book written by Deobandis to fool sunni arab scholars.

7) Alhamdulillah , what we sunnis have been saying has now been proved CORRECT by the deobandis themself!!


8) My Deobandi brother should examine the whole situation with open mind and heart. Insha Allah everyone can see the truth

DEOBANDIS AND WAHABIS : PART 5

VIEW OF SHAYKH RASHID GANGOHEE ON IBN ABDUL WAHAB NAJDI AND DEOBANDI JUSTIFICATION

Shaykh Rashid Gangohee was asked


Question: What kind of a person was (Muhammad ibn) Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi?”

“Answer: People call Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab a Wahhabi. He was a good person, and I have heard that he was a follower of the Hanbali School of Islamic law and acted upon the Hadith. He used to prevent people from Shirk and innovation (bid’a), but he was harsh (shadid) in his attitude.”

Please Note: I have heard

THE DEOBANDI JUSTIFICTAION

Read this Justification by a Deobandi where in he is trying to prove that , Shaykh Gangohee had this view because it was based on information which he got ( I HAVE HEARD). Later in this justification it has been tried to prove that Shaykh Gangohee would have chnaged his view , had he known the fact!

Read carefully

The Deobandi Justification says


" Mufti Mahmud al-Hasan al-Gangohi (Allah have mercy on him) states in his Fatawa that, Shaykh Rashid Ahmad (Allah have mercy on him) was initially unaware of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi’s position, because al-Najdi was initially known in the Subcontinent as a reformer of Sunnah, and the one who strived greatly in rejecting Bid’a and establishing the Sunnah. As such, the respected Shaykh also said what he had heard, for a Muslim should always hold good opinions about other Muslims until it is proven otherwise. "

The Deobandi Justification continues

"

Thereafter, the respected Shaykh’s mentor and teacher sent him the copy of Radd al-Muhtar wherein Allama Ibn Abidin (Allah have mercy on him) clearly refuted Muhammad ibn Abd al- Wahhab. Allama Ibn Abidin states:

“…As it has occurred in our times with the followers of Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi, who appeared from Najd and imposed their control over the two sacred Harams. They used to attribute themselves to the Hanbali School but they believed that only they were Muslims and that who ever opposed their beliefs were polytheists (mushrik), thus theyconsidered the killing of those who were from the Ahl al-Sunnah and their scholars to be legitimate, until Allah Most High destroyed their might and power.”

(Radd al-Muhtar, 3/339-340, chapter regarding the followers of Abd al-Wahhab, the Khawarij of our times)


And also

"had Shaykh Rashid Ahmad read what Allama Ibn Abidin stated in his Radd al-Muhtar regarding the Wahhabis, he would surely not have stated what he had in his Fatawa"

. Allama Ibn Abidin (Allah have mercy on him) was geographically closer to Najd, thus he was aware at first hand of what Shaykh Rashid Ahmad, who was living in India, was unaware of. (See: Fatawa Mahmudiyya, 13/411-412)
ANALYSIS


As per this Deobandi Justification, "IF" shaykh Gangohee would have had acess to the Book Durrul Mukhtar ( shami) then he might have not had this GOOD VIEW about Ibn Abdul Wahab!

How ever , this justification also mentions that later Haji Imdadullah (rh ) sent this book to Shaykh Gangohee! So when shaykh Gnagohee got this book , why did he not change his views about Ibn Abdul Wahab?

And the deobandi books are a witness to this fact that Shaykh Gnagohee became an expert in this book Raddul Muhtar! This has been stated in manu deobandi books that shaykh Gnagohee was an expert on Raddul Muhtar and used to issue Fatwa based on this book!

Read this incidence which is mentioned in both Tazkiratur Rashid and Arwahe Salasa !

" It states
" Hazrat Gangohi ( Rashid ahmed) asked his student Mawlana Mohammed Yahya sahib Kandhalvee to look for some ruling in the book Shami . Mawlana Yahya replied that the particular ruling is not present in the book". Hazrat Ganho said how can this be possible? Bring the book to me. The book was brought infront of Hazrat (Rashid Ahmed gangohi).

At that time hazrat ( Rashid ahmed) had already lost his eye sight. He took the book and turned two-third of the pages to the right and one third to the left and opened a page and said " look on the bottom side of left page" . It was found that the ruling was very much present there. Every one was amazed. Hazrat ( Rashid ahmed ) said " Allah has promised me that he will not let anything wrong come come out of my tongue"

( Arwahe salasa, page 292)


Can we see? Even when Shaykh Gnagohee was Blind he could locate a particukar matter mentioned in that book! It means he must have read that book so many times !

But Shaykh Gnagohee did not chnage his view about Ibn Abdul Wahab najdi al Tamimi

DEOBANDIS AND WAHABIS PART 4

View of a Living Deobandi Mufti regarding Ibn Abdul Wahab Najadi and Wahabis


His View about Wahabis

Can you please explain who are Wahabies (is this a sect), are they also Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jammah
I really would like to know who Wahabies are and what they believe in. I'am hanafi and was wondering what is the difference between us and them. Jazzakallahairun selam

A.) The Wahabis, who call themselves Salafis, are a group who had appeared in the last few centuries and hold beliefs contrary to the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa'ah.

They try to pull the wool over our eyes by affiliating themselves with the Salaf (Sahabah and Tabi'en) but in effect their beliefs and practices are completely in contradictory with those of the Salaf.

The Wahabis are in essence Mujassimah (anthropomorphists-Those who attribute
a body to Allah Ta'ala).

They attribute a hand, leg, face etc to Allah Ta'ala, while the illustrious Ulama of the Ahlus sunnah wal Jama'ah hold fast to the belief that Allah knows best the meaning of these words.

Similar is the case with all the sifat (qualities) etc in the Quran ie. the Wahabis take them on there apparent meaning , claiming that interpreting the Quran is not permissible, while we say that Allah knows best what it means or at times we interpret it in a suitable manner.

-The Wahabis reject the permissibility of using a deceased person as a intermediary in dua, while we hold that it is permissible.

-The Wahabis reject the Ambiyaa being alive in their graves

- The Wahabis hold that Allah is really resting on His throne in the sky, while we hold that this is from the Mutashabihaat.(Those unclear statements hose meaning is only known to Allah).

- The Ulama of the Ahlus sunnah wal Jamaa'ah disagree with the destruction of numerous blessed historical landmarks by the Wahabis.

-The Ulama of the Ahlus sunnah wal Jamaa'ah hold that taqleed of one mazhab is necessary, while the Wahabis generally do not adhere to a mazhab and claim that following one imam blindly is Bidah and shirk.

-There are dozens of other differences.


The Wahabis are vehement opponents of the Asharis and Maaturidis, who constitute the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama'ah and are two groups whose beliefs are correct. They also vehemently oppose tawassuf.

It is necessary for us to be on our guard against them as they are very active propagators of their Baatil and false beliefs.


View of the same above Mufti regarding Ibn Abdul Wahab Najadi

[ Compare it with the Official Deobandi view mentioned in AL MUHANNAD and also as stated by Shaykh Tandvi al Deobandi}

Question
What do ulemas of deoband consider about Molana Abdul Wahhab? Do you agree that the present form of wahhbism has nothing to do with teachings of Maulana Abdul Wahhab?



Answer


Your observation is correct. Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhaab [ra] was a reputable and God-fearing Aalim of the eighteenth century aligned to the Hanbali Madhab. Sheikh enjoyed unique acceptance and love across the spectrum of social class. Sheikh, in conjunction with the royal family of the time, was responsible for rekindling the love for the Qur’aan and Sunnah in the populace of the Arabian peninsula. Unfortunately, subsequent to the death of the Sheikh, his opponents embarked on a vehement campaign of concocting erroneous beliefs and views and attributed them to the Sheikh. This, in an attempt to discredit the Sheikh and to bring about discord between his followers.

When these attempts failed miserably, these opponents rescinded and capitalized on the influence that Sheikh’s name enjoyed and the love of the masses. By hijacking his movement and using it as a vehicle to spread their incorrect views and beliefs. For more information, refer to ‘The Life of Shaykh Abdul Wahhaab’ by Sheykh Muhammad Abu Bakr Ghazipuri.

and Allah Ta'ala Knows Best


WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING

Can we see this " deobandi tactical shift"? The official book of Deobandis states that these deobandis have the same belef about Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi which is mentioned in Durrul Mukhtar!

By giving this lie , these Deobandi liars managed a Fatwa from sunni Arab scholars of Arabia .

Now this Deobandi mufti was asked :What do ulemas of deoband consider about Molana Abdul Wahhab?

So let this be known that this deobandi mufti is not only giving his views but also the official view of Deobandis !

But this is totally against the official view ( as in AL MUHANNAD) !

AL MUHANNAD says ibn abdul wahab was a bad man who killed sunnis and this mufti of deobandis say that ibn abdul wahab was a good man !


This is called policy of appeasement ! The Deobandi mufti is smart to praise ibn abdul wahab najdi , but he criticizez wahabis !!

THIS IS YET ANOTHER PROOF THAT AL MUHANNAD WAS WRITTEN TO FOOL THE SUNNI ARAB SCHOLARS!

DEOBANDIS AND WAHABIS: PART 3

More View of scholars of Deoband regarding Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi Al Tamimi


1. This title (Wahaabi) means a person who subscribes to, or is subservient, to the creed of Ibne Abdul Wahaab". (Imdaad-ul-Fataawa), Page 233.

2. On Page 45 of Ashrafus Sawaanih, it is stated thus: "A story is narrated of the times when Ashraf Ali Thanvi Sahib was a teacher at the Madrasah Jaamiul-Uloom, Kanpur. Some women living in the neighbourhood of the Madrasah brought some sweets so that the Holy Qur'aan may be recited and the reward so earned be conveyed. Students of the Madrasah did not do so and ate up the sweets. This created quite a row. When informed of the row, Thanvi Sahib came and told the people in a loud voice, "Brethren! This place is populated by Wahaabis. Don't bring anything here for the sake of faatihah and niyaaz."


3. One Page 192 of the biography of Janab Yoosuf Kandhalvi, it is stated that 'we are staunch Wahaabis."


4. One of the elders of the Deobandi Wahaabi propagandist group, Sheikh-ul-Hadees Muhammad Zakariya Sahib, declares: "I am a more staunch Wahaabi than all of you."—(Biography of Maulana Muhammad Yoosuf Kandhalvi, Page 193, authored by Muhammad Saani Hasni and Manzoor Nu'maani).


5. If I had Rs 10000 I would have distributed it and people would have automatically become WAHABI --

---- Mawlana Ashraf Ali Thanvee ( Al ifadatul Yaumiya)